Question 8--Winner's Definition of Politics
According to Langdon Winner, Politics are an arrangement of power. He does suggest that although the system in which the tools are embedded plays a significant role in the ways technologies are shaped, there are ways that technologies themselves can have politics. He claims there are "two ways in which artifacts can contain political properties." These are when the artifact becomes a method for settling an issue in a community and when an item is "strongly compatible with particular kinds of political relationships."
Using these definitions, it is easy to see how certain web tools could be considered inherintly political. Looking at tools in terms of an arrangement of power shows that a tool such as the webquest gives the teacher more power than the students. A blog on the otherhand is an arrangement of power in which all parties can be equal.
Web tools do not necessarily seem to be settling issues in a community, but can certainly be used for it. A website for example, may be added to a community because they have a communication issue. In this case, the website would have politics.
Each tool needs to be looked at individually and its reasons for being present should be considered, but the potential for the tools themselves having politics is there according to Winner. For Winner, every tool could have politics.